Watchdogs and standards;Postscript;Letter

13th August 1999 at 01:00
IT IS A bold gamble for the Government to back Chris Woodhead in the face of widespread criticism of him (TES, July 30).

The Government claims that evidence from the Office for Standards in Education supports Mr Woodhead's views begs a big question - when does evidence constitute proof?

OFSTED provides evidence that is the truth and it can be shown to be nothing but the truth, but is it the whole truth? The half-truth is more dangerous than a lie and leads to miscarriages of justice. Mr Woodhead has been so focused on "poor teaching" as to be blinkered about the numerous other factors in educational success or failure.

Ted Guyver 41 Meon Road Mickleton Chipping Campden Gloucestershire

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now