We cannot judge without evidence

1st November 2013 at 00:00

Schools minister Lord Nash is being accused of misleading the UK Parliament by claiming that independent, autonomous free schools are performing better than other state schools, based on a sample of 24 free schools assessed by Ofsted, England's schools inspectorate. There are good grounds to support that accusation, but the validity of Ofsted's findings on performance (used by both parties) has not been contested.

When inspecting mainstream state schools and making judgements about students' achievement, inspectors draw on a wide range of performance data since the last inspection at that school. This data simply isn't available for free schools, which haven't been operating long enough and whose students come from a number of contributory schools. Inspecting free schools currently involves making highly speculative judgements about student progress from short observations. That is a totally inadequate basis for judging overall achievement. This inadequacy needs to be stressed publicly by ministers and by Ofsted itself. But as yet no such admission has been made.

Colin Richards, Spark Bridge, Cumbria.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now