We cannot judge without evidence

1st November 2013 at 00:00

Schools minister Lord Nash is being accused of misleading the UK Parliament by claiming that independent, autonomous free schools are performing better than other state schools, based on a sample of 24 free schools assessed by Ofsted, England's schools inspectorate. There are good grounds to support that accusation, but the validity of Ofsted's findings on performance (used by both parties) has not been contested.

When inspecting mainstream state schools and making judgements about students' achievement, inspectors draw on a wide range of performance data since the last inspection at that school. This data simply isn't available for free schools, which haven't been operating long enough and whose students come from a number of contributory schools. Inspecting free schools currently involves making highly speculative judgements about student progress from short observations. That is a totally inadequate basis for judging overall achievement. This inadequacy needs to be stressed publicly by ministers and by Ofsted itself. But as yet no such admission has been made.

Colin Richards, Spark Bridge, Cumbria.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today