We don't need to revive polys

7th March 2003 at 00:00
Unfortunately Pete Keeffe misunderstood my comments about the potential of FE colleges to deliver higher education ("Myopic leadership", FE Focus, February 28).

I was in no way suggesting that people who gain level 2 qualifications should not progress to higher-level programmes at their colleges.

The purpose of my remarks was to stress the importance of offering students opportunities to gain skills at all levels that are fit for purpose and in line with the needs of the economy.

This will not, I believe, be achieved by an elite group of colleges becoming "new polytechnics". Fortunately, judging by the lead story in last week's FE Focus ("Ministers blocked 'polytechnic' option"), this is also the opinion of the Government.

David Hunter

Chief executive

Further Education National Training Organisation (Fento)

32 Farringdon Street, London EC4A

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today