We don't need to revive polys

7th March 2003 at 00:00
Unfortunately Pete Keeffe misunderstood my comments about the potential of FE colleges to deliver higher education ("Myopic leadership", FE Focus, February 28).

I was in no way suggesting that people who gain level 2 qualifications should not progress to higher-level programmes at their colleges.

The purpose of my remarks was to stress the importance of offering students opportunities to gain skills at all levels that are fit for purpose and in line with the needs of the economy.

This will not, I believe, be achieved by an elite group of colleges becoming "new polytechnics". Fortunately, judging by the lead story in last week's FE Focus ("Ministers blocked 'polytechnic' option"), this is also the opinion of the Government.

David Hunter

Chief executive

Further Education National Training Organisation (Fento)

32 Farringdon Street, London EC4A

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now