We need a compromise on Shakespeare

22nd September 2006 at 01:00
The RSC is right to raise concerns about children's experience of the Bard.

Specifically, they are correct to point an accusing finger at the current key stage 3 assessment regime, rather than at secondary English practitioners. Given the targets and league table culture, the high stakes nature of the tests, and the highly reductive mode of assessment in place, teachers will inevitably feel huge pressures to "teach to the tests".

Incidentally, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority is currently consulting on changes to the set plays for study at KS3. The National Association for the Teaching of English remains implacably opposed to the arrangements for the statutory testing of Shakespeare; on the basis that one violently opposed to the death penalty would hardly debate the best method of execution. We would not encourage English teachers to engage in this consultation.

Simon Gibbons Chair, National Association for the Teaching of English 9 to14 committee

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today