We need a proper theory of learning

27th April 2001 at 01:00
Barry Baker's doubts and suggestions for the new educational psychology in teacher training (Friday, April 13) still leave the topic lacking coherence. For instance, should I file The Magic Flute under audible, visual or kinaesthetic memory? If I fail to mention the performance next day at work, does this mean I have not been emotionally captivated?

Is "inforation" an example of jargon hurriedly borrowed from the high-tech industries?

A clear theory of learning has yet to emerge, one that might be used within the various disciplines by teachers and colleagues. So far the buzzword "learning" provides little practical support - the theories are underdeveloped.

Neil Richardson, Ossett, West Yorkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today