Web policy is over-protection

29th December 2000 at 00:00
I AGREE totally with the policy that we must protect children from threats through the web.

However, the lengths that seem to be demanded on web-based media would only be effective if they were extended to other media: all television and magazine reports about schools and children would need to blur the faces of those involved to stop them from being spotted by paedophiles; all newspapers that run articles with children's photos unblurred would need to be stopped; all printed prospectuses ad school photos would need to remove children from the risk that their publicity could generate; and all church-based publications would need the same rules.

All of which would be an over-reaction.

However, I would recommend that children's photos are never linked to their personal addresses; children are never left to use the internet unsupervised and they only visit chatrooms where members are not anonymous and are verified by a third party.

Name and address supplied


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today