When not to suspend staff

24th July 1998 at 01:00
ANAT Arkin's article (TES, July 3) stated that "suspension is justified where an employer is satisfied that a case is going to be one of gross misconduct".

An employer would be very unwise to suspend a teacher on these grounds, before any investigation had been undertaken. The employer could - and no doubt would - be accused of having pre-judged the inquiry.

Some examples of more usual reasons for suspending an employee might be:

* to protect that teacher's position; * where other people from whom witness statements could be required might be intimidated by the continued presence of that teacher at the school; * where the safety of a pupil or other person might be at risk; * where the good reputation of the school might be put at risk.

Many authorities will have prepared disciplinary procedures, which will usually have been adopted within schools. which will often cite when suspending an employee would be justified.

Tony Parker Head of legal services Northampton County Council

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today