Whose side is an LEA on?

24th November 1995 at 00:00
Geoffrey Samuel is wrong (TES, November 10). A "continuous process of monitoring, evaluation and inspection" is far from a threatening regime imposed by a menacing local education authority.

Rather it is a programme of individual school support, negotiated by the LEA in the role of critical friend, where the majority of the monitoring and evaluation is actually undertaken by the school itself as part of its own development planning.

Geoffrey Samuel's allegations of bureaucratic and political interference by LEAs do a grave injustice to those many parts of the country where constructive partnerships have done a tremendous amount to promote educational improvement and opportunity.

These words of mine are no empty rhetoric. They are the reality of a system which has been in operation for many years. Indeed, many schools now use their own money to top up the core programme - and that includes a number of our grant-maintained schools. I have no doubt whose side this LEA is on!

KEITH ANDERSON

Chief education officer

Gloucestershire County Council

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now