Whose side is an LEA on?

24th November 1995 at 00:00
Geoffrey Samuel is wrong (TES, November 10). A "continuous process of monitoring, evaluation and inspection" is far from a threatening regime imposed by a menacing local education authority.

Rather it is a programme of individual school support, negotiated by the LEA in the role of critical friend, where the majority of the monitoring and evaluation is actually undertaken by the school itself as part of its own development planning.

Geoffrey Samuel's allegations of bureaucratic and political interference by LEAs do a grave injustice to those many parts of the country where constructive partnerships have done a tremendous amount to promote educational improvement and opportunity.

These words of mine are no empty rhetoric. They are the reality of a system which has been in operation for many years. Indeed, many schools now use their own money to top up the core programme - and that includes a number of our grant-maintained schools. I have no doubt whose side this LEA is on!


Chief education officer

Gloucestershire County Council

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today