Why we can get rid of marks

15th April 2005 at 01:00
Your article "Axing marks 'confusing'" (TES, April 1) might well have left its readers confused about the value of "comment only" marking.

Based on the research of Smith Gorard you reported how removing marks had led to a decline in performance for one Year 7 class.

However, what their article in Assessment in Education (March, 2005) makes clear is that the teachers involved did not provide comments which would encourage further learning. Faced with comments such as "try and improve" and "very good" it is not surprising that one pupil said: "Miss, I'd like to know my marks because comments don't tell us much." The problem here is the practice rather than the principle.

There is plenty of evidence of how this approach can improve learning - see Black et al's (2003) Assessment for Learning - Putting it into practice.

Sadly, your claim that there are "government-backed moves to replace pupils' grades with teacher feedback" seems well wide of the mark.

Gordon Stobart Editor Assessment in Education Institute of Education University of London

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now