Why we can get rid of marks

15th April 2005 at 01:00
Your article "Axing marks 'confusing'" (TES, April 1) might well have left its readers confused about the value of "comment only" marking.

Based on the research of Smith Gorard you reported how removing marks had led to a decline in performance for one Year 7 class.

However, what their article in Assessment in Education (March, 2005) makes clear is that the teachers involved did not provide comments which would encourage further learning. Faced with comments such as "try and improve" and "very good" it is not surprising that one pupil said: "Miss, I'd like to know my marks because comments don't tell us much." The problem here is the practice rather than the principle.

There is plenty of evidence of how this approach can improve learning - see Black et al's (2003) Assessment for Learning - Putting it into practice.

Sadly, your claim that there are "government-backed moves to replace pupils' grades with teacher feedback" seems well wide of the mark.

Gordon Stobart Editor Assessment in Education Institute of Education University of London

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today