Hitting resits with the ‘bad change’ mallet won’t help

16th March 2018 at 00:00
Policymakers in FE have a terrible habit of getting into an arm-flapping panic about real or perceived problems – just look at GCSE resits

If you stay in FE long enough, you realise that things can get a bit reactive. Like when there’s a meltdown in nuclear power plant.

I don’t fear change. It’d be a bit of a problem if I did, given that since I started working in the sector, I’ve taught a dozen subjects and had so many titles that even I’m not 100 per cent what my current one is – I’m going for “lecturer”, because it’s fancy.

I’m not overtly against shaking things up once in a while. Adaptability is an important trait when you work in a college, as new challenges present themselves with manic regularity.

But having said that, I do believe that there’s good change and there’s bad change. Good change is a considered move towards something desirable – or away from something undesirable. It’s measured and thoughtful and has definite reasoning behind whatever the decision is that is being made, placing it within the contexts of both situation and time. It’s usually made by people who have considered the ramifications of what they are doing.

Bad change is arm-flapping panic about a real or perceived problem. It cares not for issues such as embedding, practicality or consequences. It’s the metaphorical equivalent taking of a mallet to the control panel in the nuclear power plant because you’re in too much of a state to find the right button to press.

Unfortunately, from my own experience, policymakers involved in FE have a terrible habit of taking up that mallet with a rampant fervour. Take GCSE resits, for example.

'We must resist bad change in FE'

Personally, I’ve not made up my mind about the policy. I understand that GCSE represents an almost insurmountable challenge to some – and that, in turn, brings with it problems. I also know that it’s a logistical nightmare come exam day.

However, I want everyone to have the same chances when it comes to education. Until functional skills has parity in the minds of employers and other stakeholders, it’s not going to be seen as valid.

But while I’m waiting to see what the effects of a shift are, it seems like it’s mallet time. Key skills becomes skills for life. Skills for life becomes functional skills. No one’s passing functional skills because they’re as challenging as GCSEs. Let’s rejig functional skills and the rules that apply to them. Let’s offer GCSEs. Let’s make GCSE resits mandatory.

And, for some reason, the alarm still sounds.

All this in the space of a few years. No time to consider. No time to embed. No time for anything apart from the next mallet strike. An ever-present now of reactive policy change made by people who seemingly have no knowledge of anything other than the current moment.

We have to resist bad change in FE – and the unnecessary pressure, confusion and disengagement it brings to students and staff. Otherwise we’ll end up in a meltdown, mallet in hand, wondering why none of it made any difference.


Tom Starkey teaches English at a college in the North of England

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now