Time to privatise state schools

17th February 1995, 12:00am

Share

Time to privatise state schools

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/time-privatise-state-schools
We have the annual predictable moans of school governors unable to sort out their finances.

The Government rather hoped that the introduction of harder headed local worthies on to schools’ governing bodies would induce a sense of realism, instead of which the governors seem to have been seduced by the spendthrift culture of the educational establishment.

To judge by some of the advertisements appearing in the TES over the past few years, some schools seemingly can afford to give their senior managers huge pay rises and perks such as cars and private health insurance, but presumably these are not the schools which are grumbling.

Of course, no such problems beset the governors of the private schools. Their invariable response to looming financial deficit is to raise the fees. State schools cannot do this, but they could if they were privatised.

And now that the state schools have a number of years of experience in running their own show under local management, I suggest that the next great privatisation should be the school system.

Privatisation would at least equalise to some extent the existing two-tier system, since the Government could dispense its responsibilities by putting money or cash equivalent value, directly into the hands of parents. An indirect advantage of privatisation would be that there would be no need of the Secretary of State and hisher bureaucratic baggage since every parent would become grant-maintained.

The Treasury would simply issue a basic cash equivalent amount to parents for every school-age child. Parents would then be offered a real choice, since they could redeem their voucher at any school, including the present private ones.

The only difficulty would be the injustice done to the less well-off, but this could easily be remedied by the issue of the differential voucher. Basically this means that the less well-off would get a bigger school grant than the rich, by relating the value of the voucher inversely to the council tax band of the parents’ residence. Hence the leafy-suburb schools would need to rely more upon the deeper pockets of their communities, and the inner-city schools would have more money to increase the number of teachers.

CHARLES FRISBY

10 Orchard Street

Bury St Edmunds

Suffolk

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared