Unsatisfactory explanation

28th February 2003, 12:00am

Share

Unsatisfactory explanation

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/unsatisfactory-explanation
The chief inspector’s defence of his assertion that “satisfactory” means “unsatisfactory” is unconvincing.

We should insist that “satisfactory” means just what it says. It is what can legitimately be expected of a teacher in any particular lesson, given the demands on his or her time, energy and imaginative capacities in the typical school week.

We should reject the Office for Standards in Education’s condescending interpretation of the term. As more lessons have been judged by Ofsted to be “satisfactory or better”, so the demands have been ratcheted up.

How long before “good” is the new “satisfactory” and we are told that just being “good” is no longer good enough; only “excellence” will now suffice?

Mrs V Clark

34 Vicarage Drive

Eastbourne

East Sussex

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared