In the aftermath of the Florida school shooting, there have been demands for teachers to be armed, countered by calls for teachers to walk out of the classroom until schools are made safer.
North Carolinian state politician Larry Pittman has said that he wants to train school staff to carry and use guns at work. But social media is divided over whether this would improve teachers’ safety or merely leave them and their pupils more vulnerable to gunshot wounds.
These arguments are raging while pupils from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School - where 17 pupils and teachers were shot by 17-year-old Nikolas Cruz on Wednesday - pay tribute to geography teacher Scott Beigel (pictured).
The 35-year-old is believed to have been struck by a bullet after opening his classroom door to allow pupils to seek refuge inside. He was trying to close the door when Cruz walked past and shot him.
Pupil Kelsey Friend told CNN: “I am alive today because of him.”
But many commentators believe that teachers should not have to risk their lives in this way. One Twitter user said:
Others agreed, calling for stricter gun-control measures, particularly for the type of semi-automatic rifle used by Cruz:
Many more Twitter users, however, agreed with Larry Pittman, believing that the only solution was to arm teachers, so that they could respond immediately to an armed attack.
But there were also those who saw where this could lead:
And others recognised the irony in the fact that politicians were suddenly claiming to have sufficient funds to arm and provide weapon-training for teachers:
Want to keep up with the latest education news and opinion? Follow Tes on Twitter, and like Tes on Facebook