We’re not receptionists

13th July 2001, 1:00am

Share

We’re not receptionists

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/were-not-receptionists
I would like to take issue with Olwen Gunn’s comparison of nursery nurses with doctors’ receptionists (“Danger of unqualified success”, TES, June 15). I think the analogy is totally incorrect and that comparison with a practice nurse is a more accurate description. There are many instances when patient care delivered by an experienced nurse is preferable to that delivered by a doctor.

In the primary-school sector where I work, a high proportion of the teaching staff have little or no training in early years. Nursery Nurse Exam Board training is two years, dealing specifically with the well-being and education of children up to the age of seven. Mature, experienced NNEBs selected for their enthusiasm, joie de vivre, commitment and basic education can deliver effective teaching to early-years children under the guidance of a trained teacher.

Rather than dismissing us as receptionists, the education system would benefit greatly from recognising the talents available within it through developing effective, on-the-job training.

Jean Deacy 30 Sweetpool Lane Hagley, West Midlands

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared