Let’s get real about education research


Education often looks to the field of medicine for guidance on becoming an evidence-led profession. So why are we sticking to old-fashioned approaches? Here, Catherine Brentnall argues that realist evaluation, an alternative to randomised controlled trials, could be a better way to build solid research foundations in the world of education

Operating theatre

Educators have long been told that they should embrace the research approaches of the medical profession, where experimental studies and systematic reviews are seen as the route to producing rigorous evidence on what works.

We are also familiar, through the work of John Hattie, with the idea that successful educational interventions can be identified through meta-analysis: a statistical technique that involves analysing, combining and summarising previous studies, and quantifying differences by effect size.

We have a charity, the Education Endowment Foundation, set up to use and champion ...

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.

Subscribe now