Functional skills policy is 'bonkers', says Ofsted

The requirement for apprentices to sit but not pass functional skills 'undervalues' the exam, adviser argues

Kate Parker

Functional skills entries fall by almost 20%

The requirement that apprentices must sit – but not pass – functional skills is “bonkers”, according to a leading figure at Ofsted.

Level 2 apprentices are required to sit level 2 functional skills exams in English and maths, but do not have to pass them in order to gain their apprenticeship.


Background:  GCSE resits 'setting students up to fail'

Quick read: Functional skills still not ready for September start

Opinion: 'One thing is clear: GCSE resits are an imposition'


The approach was criticised by Chris Jones, the watchdog’s specialist adviser for apprenticeships, who was speaking at the Association of Employment and Learning Providers (AELP) annual conference in London today.

“I’ve been very clear that if an examination is worth taking, it is worth passing,” he said. “I think it’s undervaluing an examination to sit an examination without the expectation that you should have to pass it.

“I think that policy is bonkers. It undervalues the examination.”

Currently, apprentices have to sit and pass level 1 functional skills alongside their programme of training. They then also have to sit level 2 functional skills – which has three elements to it. Even if they fail the first element, and therefore fail the qualification, they still have to sit the rest.

Mark Dawe, chief executive of AELP, told Tes he agreed with Dr Jones.

“They sit there through level 2, have a miserable experience…and then they have to do their end-point assessment.

“When it comes to the end-point assessment, they’re massively demotivated because they’ve had a shitty experience,” he said.

Mr Dawe likened the situation to the controversial GCSE resits policy, in which students who have achieved a grade 3 pass are required to retake the qualification, instead of being able to sit functional skills as an alternative.

“It stands alongside the resits policy – forcing people to sit level 2 GCSEs without any sort of assessment about whether they’re capable of passing it or not.

“To me, it’s the same level of craziness, which has no sort of education and quality. It’s not a vein of quality of education running through policy. “

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

headshot KP

Kate Parker

Kate Parker is a schools and colleges content producer.

Find me on Twitter @KateParkerTes

Latest stories

Geoff Barton

Omicron, nativities and the DfE: Another fine mess

Schools are being told what to do by those with no concept of the reality of running a school - and it's only making an already tough situation a lot harder, explains Geoff Barton
Geoff Barton 3 Dec 2021
New headteachers - here are 9 things you need to know

Headteacher wellbeing and sources of 'streth'

Former headteacher Chris McDermott set out to find out the true causes of leader stress and support – and in doing so coined a whole new term, as he explains here
Chris McDermott 2 Dec 2021
Transdisciplinary learning: how to embed it in your school

Why you need a transdisciplinary curriculum

At the Aspirations Academies, six hours a week are dedicated to applied transdisciplinary learning - but how does it work? And should you apply something similar at your school?
Steve Kenning 2 Dec 2021