Letters extra : Should economics be the dominant concern in educational policy-making?

17th April 2003, 1:00am

Share

Letters extra : Should economics be the dominant concern in educational policy-making?

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/letters-extra-should-economics-be-dominant-concern-educational-policy-making

I wonder what well-validated scale Professor Fitz-Gibbon is using to measure the ‘true achievement’ of a degree in physics as against one in sociology (‘Doubts about quality of added value scores’, TES, April 11)? And where do the humanities come on her value scale?

Interestingly, the usefulness of a sociology degree can be demonstrated in this context. In the course of it one might learn about the weaknesses of the economistic concept of ‘value-added’, and about its current social functions; as well as being provided with the resources necessary to make a reasoned appraisal of claims about a modern society’s need for science, as against humanities or social science, graduates.

A sociological education might also lead one to question whether economics should be the dominant concern in educational policy-making.

Martyn Hammersley
Professor of Educational and Social Research
The Open University

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared