Bad break for pupils is better than none

6th September 1996 at 01:00
Squeezing breaktimes to fit in more teaching time can rob children of vital opportunities to interact with other youngsters, schools have been warned.

In recent years many schools have reduced their lunch hours and morning and afternoon breaks. Some schools have curtailed breaktimes in an attempt to tackle behaviour problems, but most have been aiming to lengthen the "working week".

Two researchers at London University's Institute of Education who carried out the first national survey of breaktimes earlier this year, however, believe that this trend is unhelpful at a time when children have less scope to mix with their contemporaries out of school.

Peter Blatchford and Clare Sumpner say: "Our research shows that breaktime can be a forum for enjoyment and activity, play and games, the development of friendships, social networks, social skills and competence; the opportunity for independence and freedom from teachers and classrooms; and the management of conflict, aggression and inter-group relations."

They accept that breaktime can be "a site of harassment, cruelty and domination" and note that the Elton Report in 1989 described the lunchbreak as "the single biggest behaviour-related problem that (staff) face". But they point out that even seemingly negative playground activities, such as teasing and name-calling, can have important social functions.

Blatchford and Sumpner's survey, which was funded by the Nuffield Foundation, involved 1,213 primary schools and 256 secondaries. It confirmed that while many schools have lengthened their day over the past five years, there has been a tendency to shorten the lunchbreak and abolish the afternoon break.

"We calculate that breaktime, as a percentage of the school day, takes up 24 per cent, 21 per cent and 18 per cent at the infant, junior and secondary school stages respectively," say Blatchford and Sumpner, who will present their full findings at the British Educational Research Association conference in Lancaster next week.

The survey also provides detailed information on breaktime supervision arrangements, but it is a second study that Blatchford and Sumpner conducted in inner London which has underlined the social importance of breaktimes.

The researchers interviewed the same pupils aged 7, 11 and 16 and documented their perspectives on breaktimes and teasing, fighting, bullying and friendships. "We have found that it is at breaktime that children develop a distinctive and vibrant culture, separate from the school culture, and not easily recognised by adults," they say.

Recent research in Australia and the United States has also illustrated how the reduction of breaktime may inadvertently affect traditional pupil freedoms. "The danger is that we may recognise the value of breaktime to pupils long after changes have severely altered or reduced it," Blatchford and Sumpner say.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now