Get the best experience in our app
Enjoy offline reading, category favourites, and instant updates - right from your pocket.

Calls for skills chief to resign

2nd November 2001, 12:00am

Share

Calls for skills chief to resign

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/calls-skills-chief-resign
PRINCIPALS are calling on John Harwood to resign as chief executive of the Learning and Skills Council after he described 40 per cent of further education provision as “unacceptable” on the BBC’s Today programme.

The BBC has denied Mr Harwood’s claim that his comments were taken out of context in the item on Radio 4.

The Association of Colleges says it has been contacted by a number of principals suggesting Mr Harwood should be replaced.

Although the association is stopping short of calling for his resignation itself, the signs are that he could face an uncomfortable reception when he addresses its annual conference in Birmingham on November 20 to 22.

“We understand and share principals’ strength of feeling about what has happened,” said David Gibson, chief executive of the AoC. “What we want is strong leadership for the sector and it is up to the LSC and the Government to determine what shape that should take.”

In a letter to Mr Gibson, Today assistant editor Eleanor Plowden said: “We feel we more than fairly represented the views he expressed in the interview with Kim Catcheside. There is always a question of editorial judgement and fairness when it comes to the editing of interviews, but we do not feel his remarks were taken out of context.”

he said there may have been a “question of overall balance” in the item, not in its treatment of Mr Harwood, but in the decision to cut a contribution from Alan Davidge, director of learning services at Stockport college.

“In this instance,” the letter continues, “the balancing voice was lost.We can only apologise”.

Mr Davidge, has written to the BBC although it says it has not received a complaint from Mr Harwood.

Mr Harwood has apologised to college principals for his words as they were transmitted.

“The effect of my words on Radio 4 and their interpretation were neither what I intended nor wish to allow to persist,” he wrote.

“They were however my words. I need not only to make clear what I meant but to say sorry for the effects they have had on you and your colleagues.”

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Register with Tes and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £4.90 per month

/per month for 12 months

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared