Get the best experience in our app
Enjoy offline reading, category favourites, and instant updates - right from your pocket.

Pedagogic clones

I share the concerns of Professor Paul Black (King’s College London) and Bill Boyle (Manchester University), that the Government’s version of assessment for learning (AfL) is “just a camouflage for accountability purposes”
4th July 2008, 1:00am

Share

Pedagogic clones

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/pedagogic-clones

I share the concerns of Professor Paul Black (King’s College London) and Bill Boyle (Manchester University), that the Government’s version of assessment for learning (AfL) is “just a camouflage for accountability purposes”. But I would go further. Although AfL is not of itself a bad thing, it has shifted the balance dangerously away from flamboyant and inspirational teaching performance towards the dreary assessment of pupil learning and the burgeoning collection of data that goes with it. This has spawned a generation of lacklustre pedagogic clones who sing from the same boring and bureaucratic songsheet.

Stan Labovitch, secondary teacher, Windsor.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Register with Tes and you can read five free articles every month, plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £4.90 per month

/per month for 12 months

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £4.90 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared