Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) should be judged by the “outcome of the senior phase” rather than simply on concerns about subject choice in S4, according to the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA).
Senior figures at the SQA defended CfE when they appeared before the Scottish Parliament’s Education and Skills Committee, saying it offered greater depth of learning and more choice.
SQA chief executive Janet Brown revealed that research by the examinations body found that there was “not a smooth pathway from broad general education to the senior phase” after the new curriculum was introduced, but a more recent study found “there was obviously a lot of progress that had been made”.
Curriculum for Excellence: What is it?
Long read: Is Scotland’s curriculum really narrowing?
Attainment: Big fall in passes under new qualifications regime
MSPs have been investigating the choice of subjects for pupils in Scotland’s schools and, during the committee’s meeting yesterday, Conservative MSP and education spokeswoman Liz Smith told the SQA representatives: “The subject-choice issue is a major concern, especially if you look at the statistics about the considerable drop-off in the numbers taking modern languages - particularly German and French - and some of the Stem [science, technology, engineering and maths] subjects.
“The real issue for a lot of parents is that while the broad general education may have given them general width and breadth than was possible before with some new subjects when it comes to the core curriculum, there is a problem about the subject choice.”
Dr Brown replied: “It is a question of thinking about the outcome of all of education, not just S4.
“It’s about the outcome of the senior phase, and is that a better point for children these days than it used to be in the old system?”
Responding to questions about fewer students taking languages, Dr Brown added: “The major drop-off in languages probably occurred when they were no longer compulsory.
“We’ve seen a fall-off in languages and we are fiercely proud of the fact that we have got some really good language qualifications that we really want students to be learning.
“What we are seeing is continued strength in the Higher so it’s the National 4 and 5 subjects that have declined, but people who really want to do languages continue to do the Higher.”
Asking about the 160-hour allocation of teaching recommended for a subject by the SQA, SNP MSP Jenny Gilruth - a former secondary teacher - said: “We know that roughly 50 per cent of schools study six subjects in S4, 40 per cent study seven, 10 per cent study eight. There is that variance nationally.”
SQA qualifications director Gill Stewart said: “The whole kind of ethos and philosophy of CfE was about a three-year senior phase building on the broad general education.
“Some of the criticisms of the previous qualifications was the so-called two-term dash to higher and trying to fit higher into a very short time period.
“One of the things Curriculum for Excellence was trying to address was the depth of learning and giving young people more opportunity for depth of learning.”
Dr Brown added: “Our understanding and our expectation is that, in order to cover the course content, for the average child is that you would have to have teaching time of around 160 hours.”
Yesterday, Tes Scotland reported that that the proportion of pupils attaining passes at the levels equivalent to the old Standard grade qualifications had dropped by a third.
