Packed lunch argument lacks punch

23rd August 2013, 1:00am

Share

Packed lunch argument lacks punch

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/packed-lunch-argument-lacks-punch

While I agree with the sentiments expressed in the recent column “Making a meal of lunch” (16 August), I cannot help but feel that Mike Kent has missed some key and valid reasons for parents to select packed lunches over school meals.

First, some children have special dietary needs. Look at a typical primary lunch menu and tell me how a child with lactose intolerance or coeliac disease would get a proper, balanced and safe meal. In short, they wouldn’t. Second, there is a rare breed of working parent who cooks a hot, nutritious family meal every day. Little Jimmy will become obese if he eats two hot meals plus pudding daily.

I fall into both categories. My son’s school couldn’t or wouldn’t provide non-dairy alternatives, leaving him stuck with a plain baked potato and salad as the only guaranteed dairy-free meal. And despite having two working parents, my son eats a fresh, hot meal every evening with the family.

So, while some parents abuse packed lunches, I suspect the majority have good reasons for providing them. I, for one, will continue to do so.

Nia Faulder, Biology lecturer, INTO Manchester, wife and mother of one.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared