Banned: Teacher who created pupils' coursework samples

Teacher who submitted own work to exam board for coursework moderation and inflated pupils' grades banned for five years

Catherine Lough

Banned

A teacher who tried to pass off his own work as pupils’ coursework has been banned by the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA), but can reapply after five years.

Edward Cox, 33, who was head of computing science at Redhill School in the West Midlands until February 2019, admitted creating samples for his Year 11 creative imedia coursework.

The Cambridge National qualification in creative imedia aims to equip “students with the wide range of knowledge and skills needed to work in the creative digital media sector”, according to the OCR exam board's website, with pupils mastering production skills to develop multimedia projects.

For two modules of the course – creating digital graphics and creating interactive products – Mr Cox realised that coursework from some pupils was not of a good standard, a TRA report states.

When OCR requested coursework samples for moderation, Mr Cox created a number of samples of his own to submit to the exam board.

Mr Cox said he submitted 30 pieces of work in total – 15 for each module – which were “a mix of student work and [his] own”.

He also gave grades to the exam board that “may not have” reflected pupils’ abilities and were “more in line with [the pupils'] targets than their work” in one or more cases.

After his school received a letter from the board highlighting suspected malpractice, Mr Cox admitted what he had done.

His headteacher prepared a report of the school's investigation and shared this with the Joint Council of Qualifications in February 2019.

The school also shared the report with OCR, which found that Mr Cox had “committed the malpractice offence of deception by falsifying candidate marks and creating work and substituting it for the real work of candidates in his classes called for in the moderation sample”.

A panel for the TRA found that Mr Cox had been “guilty of unacceptable professional conduct” and that his conduct “lacked integrity”.

The panel considered that Mr Cox had a previously good history as a teacher, and that he had written a statement expressing remorse and demonstrating insight into the impact his actions had on pupils.

However, it found that the “seriousness of the misconduct” meant that banning Mr Cox from the profession was appropriate.

Alan Meyrick, acting on behalf of the secretary of state, imposed a ban, stating: “I am particularly mindful of the finding of fraud and serious dishonesty in this case and the impact that such a finding has on the reputation of the profession.”

However, following recommendations from the TRA panel, he said that Mr Cox would be able to apply to have the ban lifted after a five-year review period, as this would “provide an opportunity for Mr Cox to demonstrate that he was able to participate in assessment processes with absolute integrity”.

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

author bio

Catherine Lough

Catherine Lough is a reporter at Tes.

Find me on Twitter @CathImogenLough

Latest stories

Ministers seem to think schools are wasting money - in fact, schools are experts in cutting costs, says James Bowen

Why international teachers should receive financial CPD

There's a lot to learn working in another country - not least the financial situation and how to use your money wisely, which is why perhaps a CPD session or two would be a worthwhile investment
David Keating 30 Jul 2021