Schools told not to 'bother' DfE on Covid cases

Exclusive: Heads reporting second or subsequent Covid cases told by DfE helpline not to 'bother' calling again, prompting fears that infections have gone unreported

John Roberts

ASCL has warned that cases of Covid-19 may be going unreported because of issues with the DfE advice line.

School leaders have raised concerns that Covid-19 cases have gone unreported after heads were told not to "bother" reporting new cases to a Department for Education helpline.

The Association of School and College Leaders has also revealed that the department has not passed on information from the calls it receives about positive cases to local health protection teams (HPTs) or local authorities.

The headteachers' union warns that this could mean Covid cases not be being monitored at a local level.


Covid: DfE advice hotline is launched

Concerns: Helpline criticised over failure to advice

Prime Minister: Johnson warned that lack of access to tests and advice puts schools in impossible position


Julie McCulloch, ASCL’s director of policy, also said the DfE’s helpline was being staffed by people who have little public health expertise and are “simply reading from a script”.

She told Tes that the DfE has now made changes to its script as a result of the problems highlighted, but the union is still concerned that cases may be going unreported.

She said: “Just last week, we had reports that schools and colleges reporting a second or subsequent case were being told that they needn’t ‘bother’ phoning the helpline again, as they ‘already know what to do’.

“This line has apparently now been removed from the script.

"However, we are concerned that many schools and colleges will now have come to the conclusion that they don’t need to phone the helpline if they’re confident they know what to do when they have a confirmed case.

'This risks cases going unreported'

"This risks leading both to cases going unreported, and to more school and college leaders making decisions without input from public health experts.”

Ms McCulloch also warned about information from the calls to the DfE not being passed on to other agencies.

She said: "We have had the revelation that helpline staff were not passing on information about positive cases to HPTs or local authorities, meaning that cases may not be being monitored at a local level." 

She said that the department had “added a line to their script to make it clear that schools and colleges would need to phone their health protection teams themselves to report a case".

But she said this was “doubling the workload of leaders and compromising the main purpose of the helpline – ie, to reduce the burden on HPTs”.

The DfE has said in response to ASCL's concerns that data from the advice service is shared with local authority public health teams daily.  

Tes revealed last month that the DfE had launched a new hotline for schools following concerns that heads were struggling to get through to their local HPTs run by Public Health England. 

Ms McCulloch added: “We understand the rationale for triaging calls from schools for public health advice through a Department for Education helpline, as local health protection teams were clearly unable to cope with the influx of inquiries.

"This approach has, in some cases, worked well. However, we have also received reports of difficulties being experienced by schools in accessing advice, and this is an extremely frustrating situation."

ASCL said that other issues with the advice line highlighted by its members include: 

  • Helpline staff who appear to have little public health expertise, and to be simply reading from a script. 
  • Helpline staff providing advice that is later contradicted by HPTs, leaving school and college leaders to have to reverse decisions. 
  • The fact that the helpline hours are fairly limited, particularly at weekends, meaning schools and colleges either need to delay making decisions, or to make them on their own. 

Ms McCulloch added: “We have raised all of these issues with the Department for Education and this has sometimes led to positive changes.

"However, we remain deeply concerned that school and college leaders are not receiving the expert public health support they were promised in dealing with this unprecedented situation. 

“We would remind the government that it clearly set out in its guidance for the reopening of schools in September that public health advice would be readily available.

"Instead, it has felt like schools are often having to navigate their way through byzantine systems of bureaucracy in order to access the support that they need. 

“As Covid infection rates continue to rise, and the pressure on schools grows ever more intense, it is essential that the government sorts this out.”

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “We want all schools, colleges and early years providers to have access to public health advice to support them to take the right action to respond to a positive case of coronavirus in their setting. 

 “Advisors are responsible for referring more complex cases to the PHE regional health protection team, as necessary, following a triage of the caller’s circumstances.

 “We always listen to feedback from those who have used the advice service and continue to make any necessary improvements.”

The DfE also said schools report confirmed cases of coronavirus through its online attendance form.

And it told Tes that from this weekend, opening hours of the advice line are being extended from 4pm to 6pm on Sundays, and will be kept under review.

 

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

John Roberts

John Roberts

John Roberts is North of England reporter for Tes

Find me on Twitter @JohnGRoberts

Latest stories