If you believed the pre-conference commentary, you’d have thought Labour’s return to Liverpool this year was destined to be a wake for optimism - all doom, gloom and metropolitan myopia.

But here’s the thing about narratives: they’re often lazier than the policies they purport to critique.

Having spent three days at the Labour Party Conference listening to speeches, attending fringe events and talking to educators from across the country, I can report that the obituaries for ambition are premature.

In fact, what emerged from Liverpool wasn’t a London-centric policy echo chamber, but something education has desperately needed: a coherent vision that actually remembers there’s a country beyond the M25.

Labour’s focus on local solutions

The conference took place in Liverpool - hardly a London postcode. It drew delegates from every corner of the UK. And perhaps most tellingly, the policy discussions explicitly focused on place-based approaches, exploring how education, industry and local ambition can work together - understanding local contexts rather than imposing Whitehall blueprints.

The headline announcement - the reintroduction of targeted maintenance grants for students from the lowest-income households by the end of this Parliament - merits serious attention rather than cynical dismissal.

As education secretary Bridget Phillipson noted, students’ time at college or university should be spent learning or training, not working every hour God sends. Detractors might call this “small beer,” but they’ve evidently never tried to concentrate on a degree while juggling two part-time jobs.

A wider view of education

This isn’t gesture politics; it’s addressing a genuine barrier that prevents talented young people from disadvantaged backgrounds from achieving their potential.

But the conference’s real significance lies in what it signals about Labour’s understanding of education’s broader purpose. Phillipson’s speech explicitly positioned education beyond mere workforce preparation: “It is only Labour that sees education as about the people of tomorrow, not just the workers of tomorrow. The artists and the scientists. The teachers and campaigners.”

This matters because it represents a philosophical shift from viewing education purely through an economic lens to understanding it as fundamental to social mobility, civic participation and human flourishing.

The focus on place-based solutions ran throughout the conference programme. Discussions about improving productivity through a more responsive post-16 skills system emphasised working with local business and civic leaders - precisely the kind of regional engagement critics claim was absent.

These aren’t theoretical debates; they’re practical explorations of how national policy can learn from local success and adapt to regional needs.

The breadth of ambition

What’s striking is the breadth of ambition. From guidelines for the safe deployment of artificial intelligence in education to curriculum reform and inspection overhaul, this government is tackling issues that have festered for years.

Yes, some proposals need more detail. Yes, funding remains tight.

But the alternative to ambitious reform isn’t cautious perfection - it’s stagnation dressed up as prudence.

The cynics will argue that fine words are just that, and they’re right to demand delivery. But writing off an entire conference as negative or metropolitan because it doesn’t match your preferred narrative is intellectually dishonest.

The mission-driven approach - particularly around breaking down barriers to opportunity - provides a framework that could genuinely reshape educational outcomes across the country.

Are there challenges? Absolutely. The fiscal headwinds are real, the inherited problems are substantial and turning rhetoric into reality requires sustained effort and political courage.

But judging a government 15 months into a five-year term on whether it’s solved every problem is the kind of instant-gratification thinking that created many of these problems in the first place.

Reasons for optimism

What Liverpool demonstrated is that this government understands education’s transformative potential and is willing to think beyond the next electoral cycle.

The maintenance grants announcement alone will change lives. The curriculum and assessment reforms could reshape what we value in education. The place-based approach acknowledges that Hartlepool and Hampstead might need different solutions.

For those of us working in education - for those of us who see daily the difference that thoughtful, sustained policy intervention can make - conference offered something increasingly rare: reasons for cautious optimism.

As a result of this work, a young person growing up in the North West with the ambition and aspiration to one day be prime minister may have the knowledge, skills and abilities to make that dream come true.

That isn’t too much to ask of our education system, is it?

The next four years will determine whether the government’s ambitions translate into genuine transformation. But dismissing them before they’ve had a chance to take root isn’t scepticism - it’s cynicism masquerading as insight.

And if we’ve learned anything from the past decade, it’s that education can’t afford another round of cynicism dressed up as realism.

Dan Morrow is chief executive of Cornwall Education Learning Trust

You can now get the UK’s most-trusted source of education news in a mobile app. Get Tes magazine on iOS and on Android