pdf, 4.07 MB
pdf, 4.07 MB

This lesson supports learners in understanding review as a collaborative part of astronomy rather than a judgement of ability. Begin by modelling the difference between independent self-review and interactive peer review, then establish clear expectations for kind, specific and actionable feedback. Learners should use their own observation logs, presentations or method plans wherever possible, with anonymised examples available for anyone who is not ready to share personal work. Circulate during review activities to check that comments are evidence-based, balanced and focused on the work rather than the individual. Encourage learners to identify strengths before improvements, ask clarifying questions and retain ownership of which suggestions they choose to use. By the end of the lesson, each learner should have a realistic action point for improving future astronomy work and a clear understanding of how peer review strengthens scientific reliability.

Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 30%

A bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place.

Reviews

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

Report this resourceto let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.