Was King John really the cruel and incompetent ruler that history often makes him out to be, or has his reputation been unfairly tarnished over time?
This lesson encourages students to investigate one of England’s most controversial monarchs and reach their own evidence-based judgement.
Students begin by exploring a range of interpretations of King John, including statues, portraits, Disney’s portrayal, a Horrible Histories interpretationvideo footage and a variety of historical sources.
By comparing these different views, they are introduced to the idea that historical reputations can be shaped by bias, perspective and hindsight.
Students then analyse the sources in greater depth using a structured investigation grid, helping them to evaluate the evidence and consider whether King John deserves his reputation as a ‘meanie’ and a bad king.
The lesson develops key historical skills, including source analysis, interpretation, critical thinking and judgement.
The lesson concludes with a challenging summarising pyramid plenary activity, designed to consolidate knowledge and test students’ understanding of King John and his reign.
Students will also continue to build their understanding of the medieval power struggle between the king, the Church, the barons and the people as part of a wider sequence of lessons by plotting their thoughts on a grid.
Included in this lesson:
Fun, engaging and challenging tasks
Links to video footage
Printable worksheets
Differentiated tasks
Suggested teaching strategies
Opportunities for discussion, debate and judgement
PowerPoint format, which can be changed to suit
If you find this resource useful, please leave a review. Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
Something went wrong, please try again later.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet
To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it
Report this resourceto let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.