Tha àm ri teachd tuineachadh Mars a’ dol an aghaidh creideas. Tha aithris cursory làn paradoxes. Tha oidhirpean nan SA air an lagachadh. Dearbhadh soilleir a tha a’ fàgail gu bheil Mars USA gu lèir air a bhacadh le luchd-sìthe. An ath-chuinge aca: Recant ga thagradh leis gu bheil e ro choltach ri cogadh. Bidh àm ri teachd tuineachadh Mars a’ dearbhadh creideas. Tha ath-aithris ghoirid làn contrarrachdan. Tha oidhirpean nan SA air am bacadh. Tha foillseachadh soilleir a’ dèanamh a h-uile Mars USA air a bhacadh le luchd-leantainn na sìthe. An tagradh aca: Na cuir às dha a bhith ga thagradh leis gu bheil e ro choltach ri cogadh. The future of the settling of Mars defies credulity. A cursory recount is full of paradoxes. The USA’s efforts are debilitated. A clear affirmation making all Mars USA is blocked by pacifists. Their rebuttal: Recant claiming it because it’s too war-like. The future of the settling of Mars tests belief. A brief retelling is full of contradictions. The USA’s efforts are hampered. A clear declaration making all Mars USA is blocked by peace-lovers. Their counter claim: Renounce claiming it because it’s too war-like.

Chaidh an ìre àrd de mhiann a dhol gu Mars a mhilleadh le rudan tuiteamach mun turas fhada. Bha mòran dhaoine fo eagal ron dà bhliadhna. Chaidh daoine ann an àiteachan beaga dlùth às an ciall bhon insulariy a thòisich sabaidean. Thug NASA sùil air mion-fhiosrachadh mu thursan gus luchd-càineadh a mhilleadh. Rinn e mòran mholaidhean geur gus cùisean a dhèanamh nas fheàrr. Bha an ìre àrd de mhiann a dhol gu Mars air a mhilleadh le cùisean taobh a-muigh mun turas fhada. Bha eagal air mòran dhaoine leis an fhad dà bhliadhna. Chaidh daoine ann an àiteachan beaga pearsanta às an ciall bhon chàileachd dùinte a thòisich sabaidean. Choimhead NASA air mion-fhiosrachadh làitheil mu thursan gu luchd-breithneachaidh sàmhach. Rinn e mòran mholaidhean biorach airson cùisean a dhèanamh nas fheàrr. The lofty magnitude of the aspiration of going to Mars was ruined by incidental things about the long trip. Many people were intmidated by the two year duration. People in small intimate spaces went mad from the insulariy which instigated fights. NASA looked at the mundane details of trips to mollify critics. It made many incisive recommendations to make things better. The high scope of the desire to go to Mars was ruined by side issue things about the long trip. Many people were scared by the two year length. People in small personal spaces went mad from the closed-in quality which started fights. NASA looked at the everyday details of trips to quiet critics. It made many pointed recommendations to make things better.

Bha daoine le naivete gu sònraichte buailteach do dhuilgheadasan tursan-adhair fada Mars. Rudan gnèitheach agus dualach do bhith dùinte cho fada. Nuair a chaidh a togail, thuirt boireannach snog na duilgheadasan a bh’ aice. Rinneadh goireasachd Adroit ; innleachdan gus suidheachaidhean a leasachadh gu sgiobalta. Bha daoine le sìmplidh gu sònraichte so-leònte ri duilgheadasan tursan-adhair fada Mars. Nithean inborn agus pàirt de bhith dùinte ann cho fada. Nuair a chaidh faighneachd dhi, thug boireannach snog eisimpleirean seachad de na duilgheadasan a bh’ aice. Rinneadh socrachadh glic ; innleachdan gus suidheachaidhean a leasachadh gu sgiobalta. People with naivete were especially susceptible to the problems of the long Mars flights. Things innate and inherent to being closed in so long. When elicited, a nice lady cited the problems she had had. Adroit expedients were made; innovations to improve conditions fast. People with simplicity were especially vunerable to the problems of the long Mars flights. Things inborn and part of being closed in so long. When asked, a nice lady gave examples of the problems she had had. Clever fixes were made; inventions to improve conditions fast.

Chaidh an aithris mu bhith a’ tuineachadh Mars le tùsairean seòlta a chuir sìos ro 2056. Bha an eachdraidh a bh’ ann roimhe làn de dh’ ìomhaighean de ghaisgich làidir. Bha e làn de mhòran fiosrachaidh ceàrr. Bha an aon rud ann a bhith a’ togail an dreach tùsail a’ toirt air na SA coimhead glè mhath. Ann an da-rìribh, dh’fheumadh daoine a bhith mì-mhisneachail agus umhail airson cur suas ris an suidheachaidhean cruaidh cuingealaichte. Chaidh an sgeulachd mu bhith a’ tuineachadh Mars le tùsairean dàna a cheartachadh ro 2056. Bha an eachdraidh a bh 'ann roimhe làn de dhealbhan de ghaisgich làidir. Bha e làn de dh’fhiosrachadh ceàrr. B’ e an rud as cudromaiche ann a bhith a’ togail an dreach tùsail toirt air na SA coimhead glè mhath. Ann an da-rìribh, dh’fheumadh daoine a bhith sùbailte agus ciùin airson a bhith a’ cur suas ris a’ chuingealaichte suidheachaidhean cruaidh. The narrative of settling Mars by intrepid pioneers was debunked by 2056. The predecessor history by definition was full of images of robust heros. It was full of myrads of wrong information. Tantamount in building the original version was making the USA look great. In reality, people had to be malleable and submissive to put up with the limited harsh conditions. The tale of settling Mars by bold pioneers was corrected by 2056. The former history by course was full of images of strong heros. It was full of much wrong information. Uppermost in building the original version was making the USA look great. In reality, people had to be adaptable and meek to put up with the limited harsh conditions.

TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF 35 ROCKS.

Tha riaghaltas na SA air gabhail ri gèilleadh ri sealladh neo-riaghailteach a thaobh an JFK murt. Tha na clàran air an seuladh; nach eil ruigsinneach do sgrùdadh concrait. Bidh luchd-càineadh a’ dol an aghaidh seo. Bidh teòirichean co-fheall a’ càineadh agus a’ gabhail brath air an t-suidheachadh. Is e dìreach ma sgaoileas na clàran a lughdaicheas an suidheachadh seo. Tha ceart gu leòr aig riaghaltas na SA a bhith a’ cumail ri faireachdainnean gun samhail a dh’ ionnsaigh an JFK murt. Tha na clàran air an seuladh; nach deach fhosgladh airson sgrùdadh a leughadh. Tha luchd-càineadh a’ càineadh seo. Bidh teòirichean co-fheall a’ rùsgadh agus a’ cleachdadh an t-suidheachaidh. Is e dìreach ma sgaoileas na clàran a bheir faochadh don t-suidheachadh seo. The US government has condoned conformity to an amorphous attitude toward the JFK assassination. The records are sealed; not accessible to concrete scrutiny. Critics reprove this. Conspiracy theorists rant and exploit the situation. Only releasing the records will alleviate this situation. The US government has Oked sticking to formless feelings toward the JFK assassination. The records are sealed; not opened to read study. Critics scold this. Conspiracy theorists bark and use the situation. Only releasing the records will relieve this situation.

ha an riaghaltas air aithrisean mì-chinnteach a chuir an cèill mu mhurt Jfk. Tha iomraidhean air fear-gunna singilte. Tha beagan acadaimigich air cliù a chosnadh airson barailean mu dhiofar dhòighean air marbhadh dh’ fhaodadh a bhith air a chuir gu bàs. Tha an riaghaltas air aithrisean toinnte neo-shoilleir ainmeachadh mu mhurt Jfk. Tha sanasan ann mu fhear-gunna singilte. Tha beagan sgoilearan air moladh farsaing a chosnadh airson teòiridhean mu dhiofar dhòighean air marbhadh dh’ fhaodadh a bhith air a dhèanamh. The government has articulated ambiguous abstruse statements on the Jfk assassination. There are allusions to a lone gunman. A few academics have won acclaim for conjectures on different ways the killing could have been executed. The government has stated unclear complicated statements on the Jfk assassination. There are hints at a lone gunman. A few scholars have won wide praise for theories on different ways the killing could have been carried out.

Tha an rangachd air teòiridh foirmleach a chuir an cèill mu mhurt JFK. Tha iad a’ cumail a-mach gu bheil suidheachadh aon neach-gunna comasach. Tha mòran an aghaidh a’ bheachd seo. Tha mì-fhaireachdainn aca. Tha teòiridhean aca a tha mar antithesis neach-gunna singilte. Chan urrainn dhaibh a bhith air an sàrachadh. Tha a’ mhòr-chuid de dhaoine a-nis a’ fulang leis a’ chùis. Tha na stiùirichean air teòiridh gearradh cookie a bhruidhinn mu mhurt JFK. Tha iad a’ cumail a-mach gu bheil sgeama neach-gunna singilte do-chreidsinneach. Tha duilgheadasan aig mòran leis a’ bheachd seo. Tha droch fhaireachdainnean aca. Tha teòiridhean aca a tha mu choinneamh fear-gunna singilte. Chan urrainn dhaibh a bhith sàmhach. Tha dìmeas aig a’ mhòr-chuid air a’ chùis a-nis. The hierarchy has articulated a formulaic theory on the JFK assassination. They make the assertion that a lone gunman scenario is viable. Many have antagonism to this idea. They have antipathy. They have theories that are the antithesis of a lone gunman. They can’t be appeased. Most people now have apathy on the issue. The leaders have spoken a cookie cutter theory on the JFK assassination. They make the claim that a lone gunman scheme is believable. Many have problems with this idea. They have bad feelings. They have theories that are the opposite of a lone gunman. They can’t be quieted. Most people now have indifference to the issue.

Bha diongmhaltas aig na patriots Ameireaganach. Bha iad a’ tagradh airson dùthaich neo-eisimeileach. Chuir iad am plana an gnìomh. Bha iad deònach lasachaidhean a dhèanamh airson an slighe fhaighinn. Anns a 'choloquial, pòg mus fhalbh thu. Bha an ìre seo sealach. The American patriots had determination. They advocated for an autonomous nation. They implemented their plan. They were willing to make concessions to get their way. In the colloquial, kiss before leaving. This phase was ephemeral. They were repelled by the English. There was a detachment from reality on both sides. The American patriots had drive. They called for for an independent nation. They put their plan in motion. They were willing give things up to get their way. In the common turn of phrase, kiss before leaving. This phase was short lived. They were knocked by the English. There was a sepeation from reality on both sides. Chaidh an cur air ais leis na Sasannaich. Bha sgaradh bhon fhìrinn air gach taobh. Bha draibheadh aig na patriots Ameireaganach. Dh’iarr iad dùthaich neo-eisimeileach. Chuir iad am plana air adhart. Bha iad deònach rudan a leigeil seachad airson an slighe fhaighinn. Anns an tionndadh cumanta den abairt, pòg mus fhalbh thu. Cha robh an ìre seo fada beò. Bha iad air am bualadh leis na Sasannaich. Bha dealachadh bho fhìrinn air gach taobh. Send feedback Side panels History Saved Contribute

Tha teagamhan aon-ghnèitheach air a dhol a-steach mu assasiation JFK. Mar chomharra air seo tha aithrisean truagh bho àm gu àm bho luchd-eachdraidh sage, air a mholadh le co-chothromachd bho dhaoine cumanta. Is gann gun urrainn do dhaoine stad a chuir orra fhèin nuair a thig an cuspair am bàrr. Tha tàmailt ann mu cho furasta ‘s a bha e neach-naidheachd fhaighinn fo a còmhdach an riaghaltais ann an 1964. Tha teagamhan cunbhalach air a bhith a’ crochadh mun cuairt air assasiation JFK. Tha comharradh air seo an-dràsta agus an uairsin nan aithrisean biorach bho luchd-eachdraidh glic, còmhla ri bhith a’ maidseadh feadhainn bho dhaoine cumanta. Is gann gun gabh daoine grèim orra fhèin nuair a thig an cuspair. Tha eagal air cho furasda 's a bha e preas fhaotainn a rachadh gu macanta maille ri a còmhdach an riaghaltais ann an 1964. Homogeneous doubts have lingered about the JFK assassination. Indicative of this are occasional pithy statements from sage historians, complimented by symmetry from common people. People can hardly restrain themselves when the topic comes up. There is trepidation of how ease it was to get a press subordinate to a government cover up in 1964. Consistent doubts have hung around about the JFK assassination. Signs of this are now and again pointed statements from old wise historians, along with matching ones from common people. People can hardly hold themselves back when the topic comes up. There is fear of how ease it was to get a press to meekly go along with a government cover up in 1964.

Mar a chùm a’ Ghearmailt san Dàrna Cogadh suas a seasmhachd, chuir e dragh air na Càirdean ann an 1944. Dh’ fhan an cogadh neo-chinnteach oir bha an t-arm Dearg do-chreidsinneach a’ tighinn còmhla air amasan san Ear agus chuir e na goireasan aige gu crìch airson stad deireannach. An robh Hitler saor bho phoilitigs? Ciamar a bha e comasach air cumhachd a chumail? Tha fios nach robh sluagh na Gearmailt mì-thoilichte mun t-suidheachadh. Mar a chùm a’ Ghearmailt san Dàrna Cogadh suas a cumhachd fuireach, chuir e dragh air na Càirdean ann an 1944. Bha an cogadh fhathast ann an teagamh leis gun do chuir an t-arm Dearg gun sgur a-steach air na h-amasan aca san Ear agus thog e suas a ghoireasan airson putadh deireannach. An robh Hitler saor bho phoilitigs? Ciamar a b’ urrainn dha grèim fhaighinn air cumhachd? Tha fios nach robh suidheachadh stèidhichte aig sluagh na Gearmailt mun t-suidheachadh. How WW2 Germany sustained its tenacity confounded the Allies in 1944. The war remained inconclusive as the indefatigable Red army converged on its objectives in the East and hubanded its resources for a final thrust. Was Hitler exempt from politics? How was he able to retain power? It is known that the German public did not have complacency about the situation. How WW2 Germany kept up its staying power baffled the Allies in 1944. The war remained in doubt as the tireless Red army closed in on its goals in the East and built up its resources for a final push. Was Hitler free from politics? How was he able to hold onto power? It is known that the German public did not have a settled position about the situation.

After WW1 in Germany an elaborate exhaustive study of WW1 was made. The problems were enumerated and corroborated. A new plan for war was endorsed. It is an enigma how they discounted how ephemeral the nature of German superiority would be. Many generals were dubious of a renewed war and offered discordant ideas. After WW1 in Germany an complex thorough study of WW1 was made. The problems were listed and confirmed. A new plan for war was adopted. It is an mystery how they overlooked how temporary the nature of German superiority would be. Many generals were doubtful of a renewed was and offered contradictory ideas.

In the volatile post war period, Germany extricated itself from the Versailles Treaty restraints. Hitler said a new war was warranted. Germany began to fabricate an army, air force and navy; with eclectic weaponry to facilitate their grand ambitions. Many generals had pessimism. The disparity in manpower and productive capacity was too great. The dispersal and disposition of their troops proved to make victory impossible. In the turbulent post war period, Germany freed itself from the Versailles Treaty bonds. Hitler said a new war was needed. Germany began to build an army, air force and navy; with various weapons to assist their grand hoped for goals. Many generals had a grave doubts. The differences in manpower and productive ability was too great. The spreading out and final positions of their troops proved to make victory impossible.

The consensus is that an acrimonious conviction of Lee Harvey Oswald was a certainty. I acquiesce. His composure and terse statements of innocence must be dismissed. A trial in a lush comfortable courtroom would have been incongruous to his heinous crime. The consensus is that an acrimonious conviction of Lee Harvey Oswald was a certainty. I acquiesce to this truth. His composure and terse statements of innocence must be dismissed. A trial in a lush comfortable courtroom would have been incongruous to his heinous crime. The general opinion is that an bitting guilty finding of Lee Harvey Oswald was a 100% sure thing. I can’t fight against this truth. His cool attitude and brief statements of innocence must be rejected. A trial in a grand comfortable courtroom would have been out of place to his hateful crime.

There are unwarranted superfluous stories gullible people believe. They are about a king who sanctioned people into oblivion in a labyrinth. Such gratuitous false stories; though amusing, were unprecedented in ancient times. They have supplanted the truth about the situation. There are too many uncalled for stories people who believe too easily fall for. They are about a king who punished people to death in a maze. Such freely told false stories; though amusing, were never seen in ancient times. They have taken the place of the truth about the situation.

When the trenches of WW1 became quiescent, the returning troops were pervasively venerated for their exploits. However; a scrutiny of the war led to reproving the tactics. Experts ranted at the random nature of the decisions. Generals rushed in or vacillated. Emotions had often usurped sound military practice. When the trenches of WW1 became quiet the returning troops were universally worshiped for their deeds. However; a review of the war led to criticizing the tactics. Experts barked at the arbitrary nature of the decisions. Generals rushed in or hesitated. Emotions had often taken the place of solid military practice.

The exploits and debilities of the armies of WW1 afforded a knotty training ground training ground for the new generals - the future generals of WW2. It was almost an aesthetic experience to realize new truths. They worked surreptitiously on new ideas and regimens. When they met each other, a cursory exchange of notes led to affirmation. They concurred on what should be done the next time. The adventures and weaknesses of the armies of WW1 provided a torturous training ground training ground for the new generals - the future generals of WW2. It was almost a beautiful experience to realize new truths. They worked secretly on new ideas and ways of doing things. When they met each other, a brief exchange of notes led to recognition. They agreed on what should be done the next time.

The formulaic approach to tactics by the hierarchy hindered progress. Things did not fluctuate; it was a slaughter. It kindled friction. In juxtaposition was a new type of general; the founders of a new type of warfare. They showed restraint, as their ideas were considered heresy. The cookbook approach to running the war by the leadership slowed progress. Things did not vary; it was a bloodbath. It started controversy. Side by side with them was a new type of general; the establishers of a new type of warfare. They showed self-control, as their ideas were considered wrong.

HERE IS A LITTLE STORY USING TEN VOCABULARY WORDS. THERE IS A LITTLE QUIZ BASED ON THE WORDS. CAN YOU PASS IT?!

HERE ARE TEN VOCABULARY WORDS IN A SHORT STORY. THE COMPUTER MAKES QUIZZES WITH THEM. SEE HOW MANY YOU KNOW COLD. THE COMPUTER MIXES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO MAKE UNIQUE TESTS FOR EACH COMPUTER STATION.